Inside
- architect journey
- architecture
- architecture books
- building constructions
- call paper
- climate change
- competition
- design drawing tutorial
- editorial ads
- events
- fengshui tutorial
- interior tips
- interview
- journal
- maestro architects
- Moral Responsibility
- photography
- public space
- real estate and property
- research studies
- Revitalization
- sustainable architecture
- theory of architecture
- transportation
- urban design
- urban management
- waste management
Archives
- April 2013
- January 2013
- September 2012
- August 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- October 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- September 2010
- March 2010
- October 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
Roman Architecture on Indonesian Urbanscape
By Vicky Ariyanti on January 9, 2009
Architecture has evolved from ancient time to now in many different forms and functions. One thing we have to understand that they all come from a simple understanding of ‘space’.
As New Year had just passed, which is also a form of Roman culture invested in our life, festivities are bound to take place on all earth surface; fireworks, parties, heavy conjunctions, shopping activities and so on. So, what’s this got to do with architect as a profession?
As an architect in this era, our responsibilities mounted as high as a mountain, we are the core development on earth. We need to look back in history as a reminder on Roman Architecture, which is profoundly shaping the urban scape in many cities of the world. Whether we see it as a facade on a house, a building with functions, the roman style has been implemented as classical style that is easily to be detected; massive structure of columns, heavy and bulky forms, and high ceiling. In contrast with this form, we now have high demands to meet special requirements such as: Eco-friendly architecture.
In some parts of the world this type of roman style is not needed, they would look strange and astray in totally different culture. Although so, heritage of the old colonial time in Indonesia, has left us many Dutch architecture which has a root on Roman style in some ways. They now stand as marks, but ridiculously there are some examples that try to imitate this style in totally new buildings. These inconsiderate moves will create foreign and fake feeling to the surrounding. We should know better, than recreating a Disney world into our own culture. What would be my advice to young architects out there, use your creativity to meet the clients request, without leaving out your own culture.
Happy New Year 2009!!!
May this year will bring happiness, good lucks, and success to all of us.
Readers Comments
climate change »
The Impact of Climate Change: We Need to Act, Not Simply React
January 18, 2013
The effects of climate change including sea level rise, extreme heat, storm surges, threaten water supplies, and negative effects on the infrastructure. Climate change harms public health, as it will threatens human health and well-being in many ways, including impacts from increased extreme weather events, wildfire, decreased air quality, diseases transmitted by insects, food and [...]
Moral Responsibility »
Local Wisdom Principe as a Greenship (Rating Tool) for Building
September 28, 2012

Indonesia has abundant of natural resources in terms of renewable energy according to climate change, which has already mainstreamed in most of Indonesia’s policies. Meanwhile, lack of inter-department coordination, limited access to information, and poor policy implementation just become the main weakness. One of this poor policy implementation is greenship for building. Greenship as a [...]
Most View Journals
- Le Corbusier, golden section and modular theory - 15,676 views
- Tips Menghitung Biaya Renovasi Rumah - 11,129 views
- Form follows function or function follows form? - 7,063 views
- Old Mosques of Mataram Kingdom, Yogyakarta - 6,381 views
- Architecture and Urban Forum and Conference event May 2012 - 5,835 views
- Garden City and City Beautiful Movement Theory - 5,749 views
- What is a Studio House? - 4,599 views
- The Architecture Biennale 2008 in Venice, Italy - 3,783 views
- Local Wisdom Principe as a Greenship (Rating Tool) for Building - 3,299 views
- The Aesthetic Townscape Theory - 3,039 views
- Biaya Renovasi Rumah, sediakan anggaran lebih dari RAB - 2,845 views
- January Events - 2,730 views
- Abandoned Projects; Eyesores in Metropolis - 2,599 views
- How to Photograph Architecture - 2,564 views
- Roman Architecture on Indonesian Urbanscape - 2,371 views
- Waterfront Design, a Three Cities Comparison - 2,364 views
architect journey »
Review of Indonesian Cities from European Perspective
January 27, 2013
This review was to expose general issues of Indonesian cities filtered through a framework of European urban standards, which were represented in two models of urbanity developed by Jacques Levy. The framework consists in 14 factors, with each one of them able to feed a separate lecture. It was read across from several Indonesian cities [...]
Newsletter Subscribe
public space »
Times Square New York as a Public Place
August 28, 2012

There are a lot of interesting places near Times Square, since this city relying their income from tourism sector. The Times Square located at the heart of New York City, and this place is always crowded for 24 hours. Stores and shopping centers are open everyday, as well as restaurants and cafes, many of them [...]
—————————————–
RSS 2
- Call for Paper : 2013 Cities International Seminar: ‘Resilient Cities: Beyond mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery’
- Call for Paper : Conference on “Child Poverty and Social Protection” , supported by BAPPENAS, UNICEF Indonesia, and SMERU Research Institute
- Review of Indonesian Cities from European Perspective
- Book Review : Zaman Baru Generasi Modernis, Sebuah Catatan Arsitektur
- The Impact of Climate Change: We Need to Act, Not Simply React
- 5-Star Presidential Estate in Kailua Hawaii
- Household Waste Water Treatment
- Recycle Success Story: Achievement of 50% goal in Alachua County
- Living with Flood, case study at Code Riverside Community, Yogyakarta
- Local Wisdom Principe as a Greenship (Rating Tool) for Building
Recent Comments
- MZ Omar on Interview with Architect: Raul Renanda
- jaka on Tips Menghitung Biaya Renovasi Rumah
- maria on Tips Menghitung Biaya Renovasi Rumah
urban management »
Culture Industry & Indonesia’s Traditional Markets
June 7, 2009
Background: Traditionally, markets in Indonesia were not just places to trade goods and services, but also a place of cultural and social exchange. In the ancient days, markets open once a week (the Javanese calendar only has 5 days in a week; Pahing, Pon, Wage, Kliwon, and Legi) because the population was not as dense [...]
photography »
Photograph of Solomon R Guggenheim Museum, New York
March 12, 2012

The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum (often referred to as “The Guggenheim”) was designed by Frank Lloyd Wright, as one of the 20th century’s most important architectural landmarks, especially because it’s unique building shape (formed in spiral shape). The museum is located on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, 1071 Fifth Avenue (at 89th Street), on [...]

|

Travelling ------------------
Highlight ------------------
Photography ---------------



Yeah I agree with you. Since our development era at 1980′s, we lost our identity. Almost all of new houses in new settlements areas were made by western identities (architectural style, name of clusters, etc). Commonly, Indonesian people proud to have a house with roman style.
But it is opposite situation with tourism or recreational resort which exploits Indonesian identity. Do we have to go to the cottage to feel Sudanese house? Why we didn’t get this atmosphere in our neighborhood, in our modern settlements? It’s so strange
We lost our identity. i think
[Reply]
Apart from identities, I reckon the ‘heritage’ architecture left by the Dutch during the colonization era is much better than the so-called modern architecture that we build today (not entirely true though..)
Think about it; the colonial architecture that we see on our urban scape today is best suited to our climate (as far as I remember I have never complained about the temperature whenever I set foot in a colonial structure even though the air outside is as humid and hot as hell would probably be, and the building has no air-conditioning whatsoever.
My point here is, that there’s a lot we can learn from these heritage structures; thick walls, high ceilings, ventilated roofs, and all other building engineering stuffs. Remember, architecture does not only function as container of activities, but also as climate modifier. What’s the use of talking about sustainability and eco-friendly architecture when we still use air-conds in the new buildings that we introduce to our urban scape(at least to the scale of housing and other low-rise buildings)?
If you still ask about identities, well, why don’t we return to our traditional forms of architecture? Why not make “Taman Joglo” or “Rumah Gadang” instead of 1:1 copies of other places in the world (“Singapore in Surabaya”, “A taste of Paris on the West-side”, etc.)? We can combine these traditional structures with ‘colonial building engineering’…I’m sure that we can achieve absolutely magnificent results
BTW, how come I can’t log-in???
[Reply]
regardless of dutch impact of colonization in Indonesia, there are lot’s of things can be learned such as the adjustment of the climate (tropical). So with the infrastructure like water supply, polder and reservoir.
but there are too many mistakes was made here with the buildings and infrastructures, like flood and earthquake. why people here didn’t even learn from the past?
[Reply]
I can safely say: “blame political needs!” to the disasters caused by floods and earthquakes. People won’t learn from the past as long as (a large amount of) money is involved…
[Reply]
Well well.. such good comments from all of you, guys.. Let us go back to our real identity, reintroduce our architectural style into our own people: to love Indonesian architecture.
@Andie:yups there are certainly plenty that we could learn from the past, but they need rethinking as well, because things are changing now; climate had become more severe, money had gained more power and architect has not yet being regarded as their profession responsibilities.
@Prananda: we are in such bad condition, but we can make a difference by believing that the system in our government will walk for a better course.
@Akhmad: thanks for your comment.
[Reply]
Thanks for the informative writeup. I look forward to more blogs.
[Reply]
manuj, long time no see,dude! we all waiting for your article forward here
[Reply]